Archive for October, 2007

"I Will This Day Most Joyfully Die": A Reformation Day Meditation on John Hus

October 31, 2007

John Hus was born about 1370 in the village of Hussenitz, in what is now the Czech Republic. In the 1380’s he began studies at Charles University in Prague, where he earned several degrees. He was ordained a priest in 1400, and in 1402 he became rector of the University, which meant he began to preach regularly at Bethlehem Chapel, where the people of the city came to worship.

Hus became an immensely popular figure as he preached regularly at Bethlehem. He preached twice a day on Sundays and feast days, wrote hymns, and introduced congregational singing in Bohemian, the language of the people, where before the only music in worship had been priests singing in Latin. He was known for his solid Bible exposition with lots of practical application. As is often the case in early periods of reformation, God’s people were being fed God’s Word, and it stirred up a desire for reform in the church.

A generation before Hus, John Wycliffe, the “morning star of the Reformation,” had turned England upside down by teaching against the primacy of the Pope, proclaiming the doctrine of justification by faith alone, and translating the Bible into English, making it accessible to the common people. Wycliffe’s ideas had been condemned by the Pope, but when they began to be debated at the University in Prague Hus refused to reject them outright. In fact, the more Hus studied Wycliffe he found himself in substantial agreement with most of his writings, which he also worked to translate into Bohemian.

Keep in mind that Hus lived a century before the Reformation really kicked into gear. But at this point he already taught that Christ, not Peter, is the rock on which the church is built. He preached a simple Christianity based on repentance and faith, and urged moral and theological reform in the Roman Catholic Church. He taught that Scripture (not the rulings of the pope) were the “only infallible norm” for Christian belief, and that salvation was only through true faith in Christ, a faith that works by love and good deeds and endures to the end. He believed that the efficacy of the sacraments comes from God, and offered both the bread and wine of the Lord’s Supper to the people. His highest priority was that the church be free to preach the Gospel, which is her most important task. His last letter to a student who took his place at Bethlehem Chapel closed with the words, “Preach the Word of God.”

Hus was charged with heresy for teaching the doctrines of Wycliffe, and his archbishop began to burn Wycliffe’s books whenever he could find them. Hus remarked in a sermon, “Fire does not consume truth. It is always a mark of a little mind to vent anger on inanimate and uninjurious objects.” He was summoned to Rome to stand trial, but refused to go, knowing that there would be no fair trial, only a death sentence. For this he was excommunicated, and the city of Prague was put under papal interdict, meaning there could be no sacraments, no public worship, not even Christian burial for anyone but priests.

In 1411 Pope John XXIII proclaimed a holy war against the king of Naples and granted a full indulgence to all Christians who joined the fight. Hus refused to publish the announcement, arguing that Christ’s kingdom does not advance by the sword. A papal emissary came to ask if he was ready to obey the “apostolical mandate,” and Hus said that he was. When the emissary responded was pleased, he clarified:

My lord, understand me well. I said I am ready with all my heart to obey the apostolical mandates. But I call apostolical mandates the doctrines of the apostles of Christ; and so far as the papal mandates agree with these, so far will I obey them most willingly. But if I see anything in them at variance with these, I shall not obey, even though the stake were staring me in the face.

The Council of Constance was called in 1414 to deal with various problems in the church, including the “heresies” of Hus and Wycliffe. Hus traveled to Constance, having been promised a chance to debate his theological differences with the authorities of the Church. Instead he was thrown into prison for months and never given the chance to defend himself, but only to recant. When offered a final chance to recant he refused, declaring that to do so would be unfaithful to God, to the people to whom he had preached the Gospel, and to the others who were proclaiming it faithfully. The bishops said, “We commit your soul to the devil!”, to which Hus responded “And I commit it to my most gracious Lord Jesus Christ.”

On the way to his execution his books were burned. Just before the fire was started he addressed the crowd:

What shall I recant, not being conscious of any errors? I call God to witness that I have neither taught nor preached what has falsely been laid to my charge, but that the end of all my preaching and writings was to induce my fellow men to forsake sin. In the truth which I have proclaimed, according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the expositions of holy teachers, I will this day joyfully die.

Hus’ last words were addressed to his executioner: “You are now going to burn a goose, but in a century you will have a swan whom you can neither roast nor boil.” Hus was burned on July 6, 1415. 102 years later, on October 31, 1517, a young monk named Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenburg. One of Luther’s early influences was the writings of John Hus, a heretic whose work he was surprised to agree with.

We live in a day where truth is negotiable, and theology even more so. This has not always been the case– there have been times when men would “joyfully die” for the truth, especially the truth of God’s Word. The mantle now falls to us. May God be pleased in our day to raise up an army of Husses and Wycliffes and Tyndales– men and women who love God and the Gospel above all else, who “overcome by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony, and love not their lives even unto death.”

For more Reformation Day articles, see Tim Challies’ Reformation Day Symposium.

Book Review: The Returning King

October 30, 2007

Sort of like study Bibles, there is no shortage of books on Revelation. Unfortunately, I think most of the ones out there, and in fact most of the teaching on prophecy in general, does more to confuse people than it does to help them. Lots of Christians are scared of Revelation, when we should be excited about it. I place some of the blame for that on authors and teachers who talk about Revelation as though you need a PhD or an angelic visitation to really understand it.

Given all this, Vern Poythress’s book The Returning King is a breath of fresh air. Here is a 200-page book on Revelation that gives a great overview and even a section-by-section commentary without getting bogged down in the details or trying to exhaustively explain every possible interpretation of every passage. This book helps clear away all the cultural baggage (on our end, not the Bible’s!) that makes Revelation so difficult for many of us, corrects false assumptions, and helps us to see the book for what it is: a breathtaking view of the triumph of God in history.

Poythress starts with an important assertion: Revelation is written for “servants of Jesus,” meaning its message is accessible to all believers, not just experts. Likewise, it is also applicable to all Christians in all times, not just those in the first century or at the end of the age. Right out of the gate, he gives the reader confidence that God’s word in Revelation is for him, and that with prayer and careful study he can understand it. He gives overviews of some of the different approaches, but the book is not taken over by “these guys say this, but those guys say that.” He offers a great outline before starting his commentary, showing the overall pattern of the book as well as smaller patterns within the components of the overall. The commentary is substantial enough to give an overview of each section, but brief enough to keep the reader moving.

Revelation, my NT professor told us, is a book about Christ; it’s like reading the Transfiguration for 22 chapters. When I had this book unpacked in a seminary class, I felt like I’d been stumbling around in a dark room and someone turned on the light. This book does the same thing. If you’re intimidated by Revelation, pick this up and work through it. You’ll be richly rewarded.

Get Ready

October 29, 2007

My friend Annie has persuaded me to participate in National Blog Posting Month. I don’t even know if this is a real thing, but I trust Annie. So, Lord willing and the creek don’t rise,* you’ll have a post every day in November. Fortunately I have a stack of books waiting to be reviewed, and several of them look really good.

Also, Wednesday I’ll be participating in real blogger Tim ChalliesReformation Day Symposium, where he invites people to write on some topic related to the Reformation or Reformed theology, and posts links to all the blogs. That will hopefully drive some traffic, so I’m going to have to do some straightening up around here to get ready. So for the 8 people who actually read this thing on a regular basis, be nice to the visitors. Introduce yourself. Maybe even go out to lunch.

*I’m from Georgia, where we say things like this.

GLORY STINKIN’ GLORY

October 27, 2007


Oh, it was beautiful. Near indescribable. Quite possibly the second greatest thing that’s happened this year.

Phone calls and texts were exchanged. Sam squealed and bounced (which is pretty normal, but I think he had some extra spring in his step.) Bratwursts were grilled. Sam went to bed. We continued to celebrate. I’ll probably wear red for days.

And for the record, Melissa’s been calling it for a week. It’s great to be a Georgia Bulldog.

(sorry, Blue Sky readers, but this merited cross-posting.)

Not Available at the RTS Bookstore

October 24, 2007


You’d be surprised what I find in book catalogs.

Albert Einstein and the Greatness of God

October 24, 2007

In Let the Nations Be Glad, John Piper makes a point related to what I was trying to say in the last post. He introduces it by quoting a scientist speaking about Albert Einstein and his distaste for organized religion.

“The design of the universe… is very magnificent and shouldn’t be taken for granted. In fact, I believe that is why Einstein had so little use for organized religion, although he strikes me as a basically very religious man. He must have looked at what the preachers said about God and felt that they were blaspheming. He had seen much more majesty than they had ever imagined, and they were just not talking about the real thing. My guess is that he simply felt that religions he’d run across did not have proper respect… for the author of the universe.”

The charge of blasphemy is loaded. The point is to pack a wallop behind the charge that in our worship services God simply doesn’t come through for who he is. He is unwittingly belittled. For those who are stunned by the indescribable magnitude of what God has made, not to mention the infinite greatness of the One who made it, the steady diet on Sunday morning of practical how-to’s and psychological soothing and relational therapy and tactical planning seem dramatically out of touch with Reality– the God of overwhelming greatness. (18-19)

What Politics Reveals About Christians

October 20, 2007

So there was a big “Values Voters” shindig this weekend, and all the Republican candidates came to sweet-talk evangelicals. This story, on Guiliani’s talk, made me wonder, how stupid do people think we are? Or more appropriately, how stupid are we? I mean, a guy with a personal moral record no better than Bill Clinton comes along, tells a few jokes, throws in some religious-sounding stuff, and we’re supposed to roll over and let him rub our belly? “Don’t you just want me to be honest,” and then some BS about how his “faith” is so heartfelt but private?

Actually, if it weren’t for his moral bankruptcy and his position on abortion I would probably be a huge Guiliani fan. He has the gravitas and the, shall we say, cajones to decisively lead the country. But seriously, why do we let these guys come feed us lines like that? It happened with Clinton too– he could speak our language and we just loved the attention. At what point are we going to be credible enough that Republicans (and Democrats) no longer think they can just throw verbal candy at us?

Here’s something to chew on: I think one reason the world takes us for suckers, acts as though our faith isn’t really that important of a thing, is that we act that way. Look at the Christian culture. We look just like the world, minus ten years and creativity. Joel Osteen is all over the networks with that charming smile and that self-help anti-gospel. Listen to Christian radio, if you can stand it. Read our books. Listen to our sermons, with our funny stories and seven-ways-to-do-this-or-that. We give no indication that we are talking about holy things, life and death things, serious things. There’s no sense that we really believe God is as holy as the Bible says he is, and that his glory is the most important thing in the world. If we took God more seriously, the Bible more seriously, the Christian life more seriously, there’s just the slightest chance it might cause the world to take us more seriously. And that might get us killed, but at least it wouldn’t get us pandered to.

Why Prayer Malfunctions

October 19, 2007

Probably the number one reason prayer malfunctions in the hands of believers is that we try to turn a wartime walkie-talkie into a domestic intercom. Until you know that life is war, you cannot know what prayer is for…

But what have millions of Christians done? We have stopped believing that we are in a war. No urgency, no watching, no vigilance. No strategic planning. Just easy peace and prosperity. And what did we do with the walkie-talkie? We tried to rig it up as an intercom in our houses and cabins and boats and cars– not to call in firepower for conflict with a mortal enemy but to ask for more comforts in the den.

–Piper, Let the Nations Be Glad, 49

Book Review: Confronting Kingdom Challenges

October 18, 2007

Confronting Kingdom Challenges is a collection of addresses from a gathering of the World Reformed Fellowship in March 2006. The theme of the conference was the burdens and opportunities the church worldwide faces and how we can, well, confront them. Some of the topics addressed are AIDS, sex trafficking, urban poverty, and ethnic conflict in the Middle East.

This book is a good introduction to several of the problems it discusses, a sort of heads-up to the church that they’re out there, and that we need to consider how the body of Christ will address them. I was especially challenged by the chapter on the Middle East, and the chapter on missions gives some good foundations for how the church should engage an increasingly global culture.

I’m a big-picture/visionary kind of guy, so I’m into things like this that ask the question of what the global church should do. The hard thing about that is that you run the risk of having huge grandiose ideas, talking in generalities and never getting down to how you are going to achieve those ideas. That’s a weakness of mine, and I think it’s also a weakness of this book. Because the authors address what “the church” should do about several immense topics, each in a fairly brief chapter, there just isn’t room to offer much in the way of practical application. Some of the chapters suffered more than others from this, but there were several points where I thought no real action was being recommended.

I was also a little turned off by the frequent references to what “Reformed Christians” and “Reformed churches” should be doing about this or that. Of course, this isn’t surprising given that the addresses were given to the World Reformed Fellowship, but after a while it begins to sound like we think we’re the only real Christians around. References to church cooperation were usually specific to Reformed churches of different denominations working together. But honestly, there’s just not that much difference between a Reformed Baptist, a Presbyterian and a Dutch Reformed church. It’s not all that hard for them to work together because the distinctives are pretty minor in the scheme of things. Throw a Bible-believing Pentecostal or Methodist church into the mix, and that’s where it really begins to look like we’re making an effort to cooperate for the sake of the Gospel.

So the book has weaknesses, but as an introduction to some serious issues facing the church, this book is a good read. It’s especially strong on humanitarian topics, and should convict us of the need to put the Gospel into action by addressing these before a world that doesn’t believe Christians care.

Side comment: I really like the look of this book. The colors and design of the cover are really cool, and I like the font used in the headings. You can have that for free.

Ministry and the Lordship of Christ

October 18, 2007

Finally, of course, missions must be confessional. Jesus is Lord. And Jesus must become Lord. Every system, every power, and every city must brought under the lordship of Christ. We do not minister to global youth for the sake of global youth. We do not minister to global urban poor for the sake of global urban poor. We do not even perform such ministries in order to achieve the status of sheep rather than goats. We do ministry/missions for the sake of Jesus. We do them in order to bring him honor and glory. We do them as a way of seeking to move the cosmos toward that day when “at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Phil 2: 10-11). We do them because that will be the best expression of globalization of all!

–Manuel Ortiz, “Sharing the Opportunity of Ministry
to the Global Urban Poor,” in Confronting Kingdom Challenges